[36] Financial risk reporting

Capital management

One of the prime objectives of capital management is to ensure liquidity at all times. Measures aimed at achieving these objectives include the optimisation of the capital structure, the reduction of liabilities and ongoing Group cash flow planning and management. The inflows from the IPO and the capital increases as well as the existing cash from 2012 were predominantly used for repayment of the SFA liabilities and the floating rate note, which had been due in 2018. Following on from the amendment and extension of the SFA loan in July 2012, a further corporate bond was issued in February 2013 (see ‘Credit terms’ table in note [29]) as another way of meeting long-term financing requirements.

Close cooperation between local units and the Group head office ensures that the local legal and regulatory requirements faced by foreign group companies are taken into account in capital management.

Net financial debt – defined as the difference between financial liabilities (excluding lease liabilities) and cash and cash equivalents – is the key performance measure used in liquidity planning at Group level (see note [29]) and amounted to €979.3 million in 2013 (2012: €1,790.1 million).

Credit risk

In certain finance and operating activities, the KION Group is subject to credit risk, i.e. the risk that partners will fail to meet their contractual obligations. This risk is limited by diversifying business partners based on certain credit ratings. The Group only enters into transactions with business partners and banks holding a good credit rating and subject to fixed limits. Counterparty risks involving our customers are managed by the individual Group companies.

The following table shows the age structure of receivables as at the reporting date: >> Table 100

Impairment losses are based on the credit risk associated with the receivables, the risk being assessed mainly using factors such as customer credit rating and failure to adhere to payment terms.

Some of the receivables that were overdue as at the reporting date, but for which no impairment losses had been reported, were offset by corresponding trade payables. Apart from this item, the Group did not hold any significant collateral.

Liquidity risk

Based on IFRS 7, a liquidity risk arises if a company is unable to meet its financial liabilities. The KION Group maintains a liquidity reserve in the form of lines of credit and cash in order to ensure financial flexibility and solvency. The age structure of financial liabilities is reviewed continually. The inflows from the IPO and the capital increases were predominantly used for the repayments. This led to an improvement in the age structure in the reporting year. As a result of the IPO, there was also a significant improvement in the KION Group’s credit profile, and consequently in its credit rating. In July 2013, Moody’s upgraded its corporate family rating by three notches, from B3/positive to Ba3/stable, while Standard & Poor’s also significantly improved its rating for the KION Group, from B/stable to BB-/positive.

All of the contractually agreed payments under recognised financial liabilities as at 31 December 2013 and 2012, including derivative financial instruments with negative fair values, are shown in >> Tables 101–102

The calculation of future cash flows for derivative financial liabilities includes all currency forwards and interest-rate swaps that have negative fair values as at the reporting date.

Bank guarantee lines (e.g. sureties, performance bonds) had been issued under the ancillary facility agreements for a total amount in the low double-digit millions as at 31 December 2013. They included guarantees payable ‘on first demand’. No guarantees were utilised in 2013.

In some cases, the KION Group retains insignificant rights and duties in connection with fully derecognised financial assets, primarily the provision of limited reserves for defaults. The recognised assets that serve as reserves for defaults and are reported under other current financial assets, stood at €1.0 million as at 31 December 2013 (31 December 2012: €0.0 million). However, the short residual maturity of these financial assets meant their carrying amount was almost the same as their fair value. The maximum downside risk arising on the transferred and fully derecognised financial assets amounted to €5.0 million as at 31 December 2013 (31 December 2012: €0.0 million).

Default risk

For financial assets, default risk is defined as the risk that a counterparty will default, and hence is limited to a maximum of the carrying amount of the assets relating to the counterparty involved. The potential default risk attaching to financial assets is mitigated by secured forms of lending such as reservation of title, credit insurance and guarantees, and potential netting agreements.

Specific valuation allowances for defaults are recognised to reflect the risk arising from primary financial instruments. Financial transactions are only entered into with selected partners holding good credit ratings. Investments in interest-bearing securities are limited to investment-grade securities.

Risks arising from financial services

The KION Group’s leasing activities mean that it may be exposed to residual value risks from the marketing of trucks that are returned by the lessee at the end of a long-term lease and subsequently sold or re-leased. Residual values in the markets for used trucks are therefore constantly monitored and forecast.

The KION Group regularly assesses its overall risk position arising from financial services, recognising write-downs, valuation allowances or provisions to cover the risks it identifies. It immediately takes account of any changes in residual values when calculating new leases.

In addition, residual values are mainly based on remarketing agreements that continued to achieve positive outcomes in 2013; any residual-value risk under these agreements is transferred to the external leasing company. Groupwide standards to ensure that residual values are calculated conservatively reduce risk and provide the basis on which to create the transparency required. KION also has an IT system for residual-value risk management.

The KION Group mitigates its liquidity risk and interest-rate risk by ensuring that most of its transactions and funding loans have matching maturities. Long-term leases are primarily based on fixed-interest agreements. The credit facilities provided by various banks ensure that the Group has sufficient liquidity.

In order to exclude currency risk, KION generally funds its leasing business in the local currency used in each market.

Because of low default rates, counterparty risk has not been significant to date in the KION Group. The Group did not identify any material year-on-year changes in 2013. The KION Group’s losses from defaults are also mitigated by its receipt of the proceeds from the sale of repossessed trucks. In addition, it primarily offers financial services indirectly via selected funding partners, and the KION Group bears the counterparty risk in less than 5 per cent of cases. The credit risk management system was refined as part of the work to transfer financial services activities to a separate segment. In particular, this involved revising procedures on operational and organisational structure as well as processes for risk management and control.

Currency risk

In accordance with its treasury risk policy, the KION Group hedges currency risks both locally at the level of the individual companies and centrally via KION Material Handling GmbH in order to meet the prescribed minimum hedging ratios.

The main hedging instruments employed are foreign-currency forwards, provided that there are no country-specific restrictions on their use.

At company level, hedges are entered into for highly probable future transactions on the basis of rolling 15-month forecasts, as well as for firm obligations not reported in the statement of financial position. In accordance with IAS 39, these hedges are generally classified as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes (see note [37]).

Foreign-currency forwards are also employed to hedge the currency risks arising in the course of internal financing.

The following table shows an overview of the foreign-currency forwards entered into by the KION Group. >> Table 103

Significant currency risks from financial instruments are measured on the basis of value at risk (VaR) as part of internal Group management. VaR figures are calculated using a historical variance-covariance matrix. Currency risks from financial instruments as defined by IFRS 7 are only included in calculating value at risk if the financial instruments are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the reporting entity concerned. This means that currency risks resulting from the translation of the separate financial statements of subsidiaries into the Group reporting currency, i.e. currency translation risks, are not included.

The value at risk in respect of currency risk as at 31 December 2013 was €18.6 million (31 December 2012: €30.3 million). Value at risk is the loss that is not expected to be exceeded over a holding period of one year with a confidence level of 97.7 per cent (2012: 97.7 per cent).

Interest-rate risk

Interest-rate risk within the KION Group is managed centrally. The basis for decision-making includes sensitivity analyses of interest-rate risk positions in key currencies.

The table below shows the cumulative effect of a rise or fall of 100 basis points (bps) in the relevant interest-rate curves, with a rate of 0 per cent constituting the lower limit of the calculation. >> Table 105

The Group funds itself by, among other things, drawing down loans under its agreed loan facilities. Until the third quarter, interest-rate derivatives – mainly interest-rate swaps – were used to hedge the resultant interest-rate risk. The corresponding interest-rate hedging instruments were terminated upon repayment of the floating-rate liabilities under the SFA, which means that there were no material interest-rate hedging instruments as at 31 December 2013. >> Table 106