Independent auditors’ report

To KION GROUP AG, Frankfurt am Main/Germany

Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Opinions

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of KION GROUP AG, Frankfurt am Main, and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2023, and the consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In addition, we have audited the management report of the Company and the Group (combined management report) of KION GROUP AG for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023.

In accordance with German legal requirements, we have not audited the content of those components of the combined management report specified in the “Other Information” section of our auditor’s report.

The combined management report contains cross-references that are not provided for by law and which are marked as unaudited. In accordance with German legal requirements, we have not audited the cross-references and the information to which the cross-references refer.

In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit,

• the accompanying consolidated financial statements comply, in all material respects, with the IFRSs as adopted by the EU, and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB [Handelsgesetzbuch: German Commercial Code] and, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, and financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2023, and of its financial performance for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023, and
• the accompanying combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position. In all material respects, this combined management report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. Our opinion on the combined management report does not cover the content of those components of the combined management report specified in the “Other Information” section of the auditor’s report. The combined management report contains cross-references that are not provided for by law and which are marked as unaudited. Our audit opinion does not extend to the cross-references and the information to which the cross-references refer.

Pursuant to Section 322 (3) sentence 1 HGB, we declare that our audit has not led to any reservations relating to the legal compliance of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report.

Basis for the Opinions

We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation No 537/2014 (referred to subsequently as “EU Audit Regulation”) and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer [Institute of Public Auditors in Germany] (IDW). Our responsibilities under those requirements and principles are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” section of our auditor’s report. We are independent of the group entities in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. In addition, in accordance with Article 10 (2)(f) of the EU Audit Regulation, we declare that we have not provided non-audit services prohibited under Article 5 (1) of the EU Audit Regulation. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.

Key Audit Matters in the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Recognition and classification of lessor relationships in sales

Please refer to Note 6 of section “Revenue recognition” subsection “Lease and short-term rental business” and section “Lease business and short-term rental business” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the accounting policies applied and the assumptions used.

THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT RISK

As at 31 December 2023, KION GROUP AG reported leased assets of EUR 1,454.9 million, rental assets of EUR 737.8 million and non-current and current lease receivables of EUR 2,314.4 million in the consolidated statement of financial position. The non-current and current liabilities from the lease business amount to EUR 3,756.2 million and the non-current and current liabilities from the short-term rental business amount to EUR 716.6 million. The share of assets and of liabilities compared to total assets amount in total to 26.0% and 25.8%, respectively, and thus has a material impact on the financial position of the Group.

To promote sales in the Industrial Trucks & Services segment, the Group leases forklift trucks and related equipment components to customers by way of the lease and short-term rental business. The underlying contractual arrangements are complex. First, there are contractual arrangements in which subsidiaries of KION GROUP AG conclude short-term rental and lease agreements directly with end customers (direct lease business), which are refinanced, in part, via external financing partners by way of sale & leaseback transactions and, in part, via credit facilities and securitised transactions. Second, there are contractual arrangements in which the Group sells leased assets to external leasing companies (financing partners), which then conclude their lease agreements with end customers (indirect lease business).

Owing to the high transaction volume and the complex contractual arrangements, KION GROUP AG implemented IT applications across the Group that are to ensure the correct recognition of contractual arrangements and the classification of leases linked with an entry routine for recognition of transactions. Setting up, updating, programming and managing the classification and entry routines are carried out centrally by KION GROUP AG. Recording the relevant contract data and actual entry in the accounting-related IT systems is carried out locally at the subsidiaries of KION GROUP AG.

There is the particular risk for the financial statements that the relevant data are not correctly recorded and the concluded contracts are not appropriately evaluated in the entry routines as well as in the IT applications in respect of classification as “finance leases” or “operating leases” according to IFRS 16 and that the recognition at the subsidiaries is not appropriately undertaken. Further, there is the risk of inaccurate recognition of contractual arrangements. This would result in assets and liabilities not being recognised and measured in the correct amount.

OUR AUDIT APPROACH

First, we gained an understanding of the process used to record and recognise contracts in the sales lease business. We evaluated the accounting policies used by the Group for the recognition of different contractual arrangements and leases for their compliance with the requirements of IFRS. In particular, we analysed contracts selected on the basis of risk for the evaluation of the recognition of different contractual arrangements and satisfied ourselves of their proper recognition.

Based on our understanding of the process, we then evaluated the design and establishment of the internal controls for the recognition of different contractual arrangements and the classification of the leases.

With regard to the IT applications in place, we evaluated whether the defined criteria and data for recognition and classification of leases and the automated entry routines are suitable to ensure compliant recognition with the relevant IFRSs. Further, we evaluated the appropriateness of the classification and entry routines.

In the course of our tests of details of contracts, we evaluated the correctness of the data entries in the IT applications for contracts selected on the basis of a non-statistical sampling technique. For this purpose, we compared the data entries with the underlying original contracts. Further, we obtained third-party confirmations for refinancing transactions with external financing partners based on sampling selected on the basis of risk and satisfied ourselves of the completeness and accuracy of data entry in the IT applications on the basis of this. Based on the data entered, for each sample element a check was also made to whether the results of the IT applications in respect of classification and entry of contracts were in compliance with the IFRSs.

Finally, we evaluated whether the findings of the IT applications were complete and accurately taken over in the financial accounting of the Group.

OUR OBSERVATIONS

The KION GROUP AG has suitable procedures for recognising contractual relationships as well as the recognition and classification of lease arrangements in the sales lease business.

Recognition of revenue from customer-specific construction contracts as well as the determination of provisions for onerous contracts in the project business of the Supply Chain Solutions segment.

Please refer to Note 6, section “Revenue recognition” subsection “Project business contracts” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the accounting policies applied and the assumptions used.

THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT RISK

As at 31 December 2023, KION GROUP AG reported contract assets of EUR 403.3 million (PY: EUR 528.8 million) and contract liabilities of EUR 773.3 million (PY: EUR 826.1 million) in the consolidated statement of financial position. For contract assets, this corresponds to a share of 2.3% of total assets; contract liabilities correspond to 4.5% of total equity and liabilities.

Revenue from project business in the Supply Chain Solutions segment amounts to EUR 1,930.9 million (PY: EUR 2,827.6 million), which corresponds to 65.6% of the total revenue of the Supply Chain Solutions segment (PY: 74.6%).

Revenue in the project business of the Supply Chain Solutions segment is recognised over time based on the stage of completion. The stage of completion is determined using the proportion of contract costs incurred compared with the estimated total contract costs (cost to cost method).

Provisions for onerous contracts are recognised for contracts for which the estimated total costs exceed the expected contract revenue.

Determining the revenue to be recognised from the project business in the Supply Chain Solutions segment is complex and based on estimates requiring judgement. This relates in particular to the total costs of the orders estimated as at the reporting date which determine both the stage of completion and the loss expected from the contract.

There is the risk for the financial statements that the revenue from not yet completed construction contracts is not stated in the correct amount and losses from these are not recognised as an onerous contract provision in an appropriate amount.

OUR AUDIT APPROACH

Based on our understanding of the process, we assessed the design and setup of the internal controls regarding the estimate of the total contract costs over the project term and the determination of provisions for onerous contracts, particularly in respect of estimates requiring judgement.

In addition, we examined the accuracy of the Company’s previous forecasts by comparing the cost estimates for contracts already completed with the costs actually incurred for these contracts and analysed deviations.

We performed the following audit procedures (among others) for contracts specifically selected on the basis of risk:

• Analysis of the underlying contracts for projects newly completed in the reporting year
• Inspection of current cost calculations and internal reporting on the contract
• Inquiries of employees involved with the project based on the internal reporting on project controlling, including estimates of total contract costs, current opportunities and risks, the status of projects, unexpected cost trends and potential contractual penalties and expected losses
• Inspection of selected projects on site to confirm the information obtained from the project inquiries, especially regarding project progress

In addition, we performed the following audit procedures for a representative sample:

• Reconciliation of the actual cost allocated to the contracts with internal cost schedules and external documents
• Assessment of the computational accuracy of the stage of completion determined and the revenue recognised as well as any anticipated losses and the proper determination of provisions for onerous contracts.

OUR OBSERVATIONS

The approach for recognising revenue and for determining provisions for onerous contracts for construction contracts that are not yet complete is appropriate. The assumptions and methods underlying the accounting are overall appropriate.

Impairment testing of goodwill in the Supply Chain Solutions segment

Explanatory notes on impairment testing can be found in Notes 6 and 16 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT RISK

As at 31 December 2023, goodwill amounted to EUR 3,558.0 million and, at 20.5% of total assets, accounts for a substantial share of assets. An amount of EUR 2,053.7 million of goodwill is attributable to the Supply Chain Solutions operating segment.

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at the level of the operating segments. If impairment triggers arise during the financial year, an event-driven goodwill impairment test is also carried out during the year. For goodwill impairment testing, the carrying amount is compared with the recoverable amount of the respective operating segment. The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use of the operating segment. For the impairment test, the Company primarily determines the value in use as the higher amount and compares this with the respective carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the value in use, an impairment loss is recognised. The reporting date for impairment testing is 31 December 2023.

Impairment testing of goodwill is complex and based on a range of assumptions that require judgement. These include the expected business and earnings performance of the operating segment for the next five years, the assumed long-term growth rate and the discount rate used.

As a result of the impairment test performed, the Company did not identify any impairment. However, the Company’s sensitivity analysis indicated a reasonably possible change in the profit margin or the long-term growth rate would lead to the value in use of the Supply Chain Solutions operating segment being impaired.

There is the risk for the consolidated financial statements that an existing need to recognise impairment losses is not identified. There is also the risk that the related disclosures in the notes are not appropriate.

OUR AUDIT APPROACH

With the involvement of our valuation specialists, we assessed, among other things, the appropriateness of the key assumptions as well as the Company’s calculation model. For this purpose we discussed the expected business and earnings performance and the assumed long-term growth rates for the Supply Chain Solutions operating segment with those responsible for planning. We also reconciled this information with other internally available forecasts and the budget prepared by management and approved by the Supervisory Board as well as the medium-term planning approved by management. Furthermore, we evaluated the consistency of assumptions with external market assessments.

We also evaluated the accuracy of the Company’s previous forecasts by comparing the budgets of previous financial years with actual results and by analysing deviations. We compared the assumptions and data underlying the discount rate – in particular the risk-free rate, the market risk premium and the beta factor – with own assumptions and publicly available information.

To assess the methodically and mathematically correct implementation of the valuation method, we verified the Company’s valuation using our own calculations and analysed deviations.

In order to take forecast uncertainty into account, we examined the impact of potential changes in the discount rate, the earnings performance and the long-term growth rate on the value in use by calculating alternative scenarios and comparing these with the values stated by the Company (sensitivity analysis).

Finally, we assessed whether the disclosures in the notes regarding impairment testing of goodwill are appropriate. This also included an assessment of the appropriateness of disclosures in the notes according to IAS 36.134(f) on sensitivity in the event of a reasonably possible change in the key assumptions for the Supply Chain Solutions operating segment used for measurement.

OUR OBSERVATIONS

The calculation model used for the impairment test of the goodwill for the Supply Chain Solutions operating segment is appropriate and consistent with the applicable measurement principles. The Company’s assumptions and data underlying the valuation are overall appropriate. The related disclosures in the notes are appropriate.

Other information

Management and/or the Supervisory Board are/is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the following components of the combined management report, whose content was not audited:

• the Group’s separate non-financial report, which is referred to in the combined management report,
• the combined corporate governance statement for the Company and the Group referred to in the combined management report, and
• information extraneous to combined management reports and marked as unaudited.

The other information also includes the remaining parts of the annual report. The other information does not include the consolidated financial statements, the combined management report information audited for content and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report do not cover the other information, and consequently we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in so doing, to consider whether the other information

• is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements, with the combined management report information audited for content or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or
• otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

Responsibilities of Management and the Supervisory Board for the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report

Management is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that comply, in all material respects, with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB and that the consolidated financial statements, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position, and financial performance of the Group. In addition, management is responsible for such internal control as they have determined necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i.e., fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. They also have the responsibility for disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. In addition, they are responsible for financial reporting based on the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.

Furthermore, management is responsible for the preparation of the combined management report that, as a whole, provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and is, in all material respects, consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements, and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. In addition, management is responsible for such arrangements and measures (systems) as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined management report that is in accordance with the applicable German legal requirements, and to be able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence for the assertions in the combined management report.

The Supervisory Board is responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and whether the combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and, in all material respects, is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and the knowledge obtained in the audit, complies with the German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development, as well as to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW) will always detect a material misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements and this combined management report.

We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and of arrangements and measures (systems) relevant to the audit of the combined management report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of these systems.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used by management and the reasonableness of estimates made by management and related disclosures.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and in the combined management report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our respective opinions. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to be able to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements present the underlying transactions and events in a manner that the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group in compliance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB.
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our opinions.
• Evaluate the consistency of the combined management report with the consolidated financial statements, its conformity with [German] law, and the view of the Group’s position it provides.
• Perform audit procedures on the prospective information presented by management in the combined management report. On the basis of sufficient appropriate audit evidence we evaluate, in particular, the significant assumptions used by management as a basis for the prospective information, and evaluate the proper derivation of the prospective information from these assumptions. We do not express a separate opinion on the prospective information and on the assumptions used as a basis. There is a substantial unavoidable risk that future events will differ materially from the prospective information.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with the relevant independence requirements, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, the actions taken or safeguards applied to eliminate independence threats.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.

Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Report on the Assurance on the Electronic Rendering of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report Prepared for Publication Purposes in Accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB

We have performed assurance work in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report (hereinafter the “ESEF documents”) contained in the electronic file ___ [clear identification of the file containing the examined ESEF documents; ___ algorithm; ___ hash value] made available and prepared for publication purposes complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format (“ESEF format”). In accordance with German legal requirements, this assurance work extends only to the conversion of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report into the ESEF format and therefore relates neither to the information contained in these renderings nor to any other information contained in the file identified above.

In our opinion, the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report contained in the electronic file made available, identified above and prepared for publication purposes complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format. Beyond this assurance opinion and our audit opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the accompanying combined management report for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023, contained in the “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report” above, we do not express any assurance opinion on the information contained within these renderings or on the other information contained in the file identified above.

We conducted our assurance work on the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report contained in the file made available and identified above in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB and the IDW Assurance Standard: Assurance Work on the Electronic Rendering of Financial Statements and Management Reports Prepared for Publication Purposes in Accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB (IDW AsS 410 (06.2022)) and the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised). Our responsibility in accordance therewith is further described below. Our audit firm applies the IDW Standard on Quality Management 1: Requirements for Quality Management in Audit Firms (IDW QMS 1 (09.2022)).

The Company’s management is responsible for the preparation of the ESEF documents including the electronic rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report in accordance with Section 328 (1) sentence 4 item 1 HGB and for the tagging of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Section 328 (1) sentence 4 item 2 HGB.

In addition, the Company’s management is responsible for such internal control that they considered necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF documents that are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format.

The Supervisory Board is responsible for overseeing the process of preparing the ESEF documents as part of the financial reporting process.

Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ESEF documents are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB. We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the assurance work. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB, design and perform assurance procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain assurance evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance opinion.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the assurance on the ESEF documents in order to design assurance procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an assurance opinion on the effectiveness of these controls.
• Evaluate the technical validity of the ESEF documents, i.e. whether the file made available containing the ESEF documents meets the requirements of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, as amended as at the reporting date, on the technical specification for this electronic file.
• Evaluate whether the ESEF documents provide an XHTML rendering with content equivalent to the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report.
• Evaluate whether the tagging of the ESEF documents with Inline XBRL technology (iXBRL) in accordance with the requirements of Articles 4 and 6 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, as amended as at the reporting date, enables an appropriate and complete machine-readable XBRL copy of the XHTML rendering.

Further Information pursuant to Article 10 of the EU Audit Regulation

We were elected as group auditor at the Annual General Meeting on 17 May 2023. We were engaged by the Supervisory Board on 11 December 2023. We have been the group auditor of KION GROUP AG without interruption since financial year 2023.

We declare that the opinions expressed in this auditor’s report are consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee pursuant to Article 11 of the EU Audit Regulation (long-form audit report).

In addition to the financial statement audit, we have provided to the Company or its controlled entities the following services that are not disclosed in the consolidated financial statements or in the combined management report:

• Review of quarterly reporting as at 31 March 2023 and 30 September 2023
• Review of the half-year financial reporting as at 30 June 2023
• Audit of the reporting package of Weichai Power Ltd.
• Formal examination of the remuneration report in accordance with Section 162 (3) of the German Stock Corporation Act [AktG]
• Project-based audits in conjunction with migration to S/4 HANA
• Assurance work on sustainability reports (ISAE 3000)
• Issuance of comfort letters
• Assessment of EU taxonomy
• Access to data bases

Other Matter – Use of the Auditor’s Report

Our auditor’s report must always be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report as well as the examined ESEF documents. The consolidated financial statements and combined management report converted to the ESEF format – including the versions to be entered in the German Company Register [Unternehmensregister] – are merely electronic renderings of the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report and do not take their place. In particular, the ESEF report and our assurance opinion contained therein are to be used solely together with the examined ESEF documents made available in electronic form.

German Public Auditor Responsible for the Engagement

The German Public Auditor responsible for the engagement is Dr Stephanie Dietz.

Frankfurt am Main, 28 February 2024

KPMG AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft